Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Quantification of economically feasible mitigation potential from agriculture, forestry and other land uses in Mexico
| Creador: | Sapkota, T.B. |
| Creador: | Dittmer, K.M. |
| Creador: | Ortiz-Monasterio, I. |
| Creador: | Mathivanan, G.P. |
| Creador: | Sonder, K. |
| Creador: | Leyva, J.C. |
| Creador: | Garcia, M.A. |
| Creador: | Monroy, D.Y. |
| Creador: | Shelton, S. |
| Creador: | Wollenberg, E. |
| Año: | 2022 |
| URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10883/22352 |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Editor: | Taylor and Francis |
| Copyright: | CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose |
| Tipo: | Article |
| País de enfoque: | Mexico |
| Lugar de publicación: | United Kingdom |
| Páginas: | 594-607 |
| Número: | 1 |
| Volumen: | 13 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/17583004.2022.2151939 |
| Palabras Claves: | Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use |
| Palabras Claves: | AFOLU |
| Palabras Claves: | Mitigation Costs |
| Descripción: | Countries often lack methods for rapidly, but robustly determining greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation actions and their impacts comprehensively in the land use sector to support commitments to the Paris Agreement. We present rapid assessment methods based on easily available spatial data and adoption costs for mitigation related to crops, livestock and forestry to identify priority locations and actions. Applying the methods for the case of Mexico, we found a national mitigation potential of 87.88 million tons (Mt) CO2eq yr−1, comprising 7.91, 7.66 and 72.31 Mt CO2eq yr−1 from crops, livestock and forestry/agro-forestry, respectively. At the state level, mitigation potentials were highest in Chiapas (13 Mt CO2eq) followed by Campeche (8 Mt CO2eq). Eleven states had a land use mitigation potential between 2.5 to 6.5 Mt CO2eq, while other states had mitigation potentials of less than 2 Mt CO2eq. Mitigation options for crops and livestock could reduce 60% and 6% of the respective emissions. Mitigation options for forestry could reduce emissions by half. If properly implemented, mitigation potentials on cropland can be realized with net benefits, compared to livestock and forestry options, which involve net costs. The method supports science-based priority setting of mitigation actions by location and subsector and should help inform future policy and implementation of countries’ nationally determined contributions. |
| Agrovoc: | AGRICULTURE |
| Agrovoc: | FORESTRY |
| Agrovoc: | GREENHOUSE GASES |
| Agrovoc: | LAND USE |
| Agrovoc: | MITIGATION |
| Datasets relacionados: | https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Quantification_of_economically_feasible_mitigation_potential_from_agriculture_forestry_and_other_land_uses_in_Mexico/21687514 |
| ISSN: | 1758-3004 |
| Revista: | Carbon Management |
| Área de impacto CGIAR: | Climate adaptation & mitigation |
| Iniciativa CGIAR: | Low-Emission Food Systems Initiative |
| Área de acción CGIAR: | Systems Transformation |
| Donante o financiador: | United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) |
| Donante o financiador: | CGIAR Trust Fund |
| Donante o financiador: | United States Agency for International Development (USAID) |
| Identificador CGSpace: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127527 |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
Sustainable Intensification
Sustainable intensification agriculture including topics on cropping systems, agronomy, soil, mechanization, precision agriculture, etc.