Show simple item record

Usage and impacts of technologies and management practices in Ethiopian smallholder maize production

Creator: Banchayehu Tessema Assefa
Creator: Chamberlin, J.
Creator: Ittersum, M.K. van
Creator: Reidsma, P.
Year: 2021
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21693
Language: English
Publisher: MDPI
Copyright: CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose
Type: Article
Country focus: Ethiopia
Place of Publication: Basel (Switzerland)
Issue: 10
Volume: 11
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11100938
Description: Maize yields can be improved through many individual technologies and management practices, but the full realization of potential benefits is generally understood to require integrated use of complementary practices. We employed two years of survey data and alternative econometric models to better understand the use of individual and bundled packages of technologies and management practices in Ethiopian maize production, i.e., fertilizers, improved varieties, herbicides, pesticides, manure, intercropping, erosion control and crop rotation (the last three labeled integrated management). Although fertilizer and improved varieties were used on 85% of maize fields, with average yields of 3.4 ton/ha, large yield gaps remain. Complementary management practices improved these yields by as much as 22%, although in variable ways. Integrated management contributed to maize yield only when combined with crop protection (herbicides and/or pesticides). Combining manure with fertilizer and improved variety decreased maize yields, possibly due to manure quality and less inorganic fertilizer used on fields that received manure. Packages including crop protection increased labor productivity by 16–70%, while using integrated management decreased labor productivity by almost half. In summary, the combination of management practices did not automatically lead to increased yields, partly related to the conditions under which practices were applied, indicating the need for site-specific research and recommendations for sustainable intensification.
Agrovoc: CROP MANAGEMENT
Agrovoc: SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION
Agrovoc: MAIZE
Agrovoc: CROP YIELD
Agrovoc: LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY
Related Datasets: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/938#supplementary
ISSN: 2077-0472
Journal: Agriculture
Article number: 938


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Socioeconomics
    Including topics such as farming systems, markets, impact & targeting, innovations, and GIS

Show simple item record