Show simple item record

Suitability of different fish species for cultivation in integrated floating cage aquageoponics system (IFCAS) in Bangladesh

Author: Ali, H.
Author: Haque, M.M.
Author: Murshed-e-Jahan, K.
Author: Md.Lifat, Rahi
Author: Mir Mohammad Ali
Author: Md. Al-Masud
Author: Faruque, G.
Year: 2016
ISSN: 2352-5134
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19727
Descriptors: Oreochromis niloticus
Descriptors: Anabas testudineus
Descriptors: IFCAS
Descriptors: Shaded pond
Descriptors: Participatory action research
Abstract: Farmer participatory action research was performed to assess production performance of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Vietnamese perch (Anabas testudineus) in monoculture and polyculture systems via integrated floating cage aquageoponics system in Bangladesh. The term aquageoponics is the combination of aqua, geo and ponics which mean pond water, pond mud/soil and cultivation, respectively (Haque et al., 2015). Three treatments, namely T1 (tilapia), T2 (Vietnamese perch) and T3 (tilapia and Vietnamese perch = 1:1) in moderately shaded ponds (MSP) and 3 treatments, namely T4 (tilapia), T5 (Vietnamese perch) and T6 (tilapia and Vietnamese perch = 1:1), in heavily shaded ponds (HSP) were used each with 3 replicates and fish were stocked at a rate of 56 m−2 per cage. Fish were fed floating feed twice daily and significantly higher (P < 0.05) individual growth rate (161 ± 2.4 g) and productivity (76 ± 1.7 kg) for tilapia were found in T1 while the individual growth rate (93 ± 12 g) and productivity (49 ± 1.3 kg) of Vietnamese perch was higher in T2 but this was not significantly different (P > 0.05) between treatments. While higher (P > 0.05) specific growth rate was observed in monoculture compared with polyculture for tilapia; no significantly difference was observed for Vietnamese perch. There was also no significant difference (P > 0.05) in growth performance for Vietnamese perch between the MSP and HSP treatments. While females participated more actively in action research in the HSP condition with production of vegetables and fish in IFCAS; vegetables production were not different (P > 0.05) among treatments. The benefit-cost ratio of different treatments was >1, indicating that investment was financially efficient for all treatments.
Abstract: Farmer participatory action research was performed to assess production performance of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Vietnamese perch (Anabas testudineus) in monoculture and polyculture systems via integrated floating cage aquageoponics system in Bangladesh. The term aquageoponics is the combination of aqua, geo and ponics which mean pond water, pond mud/soil and cultivation, respectively (Haque et al., 2015). Three treatments, namely T1 (tilapia), T2 (Vietnamese perch) and T3 (tilapia and Vietnamese perch = 1:1) in moderately shaded ponds (MSP) and 3 treatments, namely T4 (tilapia), T5 (Vietnamese perch) and T6 (tilapia and Vietnamese perch = 1:1), in heavily shaded ponds (HSP) were used each with 3 replicates and fish were stocked at a rate of 56 m−2 per cage. Fish were fed floating feed twice daily and significantly higher (P < 0.05) individual growth rate (161 ± 2.4 g) and productivity (76 ± 1.7 kg) for tilapia were found in T1 while the individual growth rate (93 ± 12 g) and productivity (49 ± 1.3 kg) of Vietnamese perch was higher in T2 but this was not significantly different (P > 0.05) between treatments. While higher (P > 0.05) specific growth rate was observed in monoculture compared with polyculture for tilapia; no significantly difference was observed for Vietnamese perch. There was also no significant difference (P > 0.05) in growth performance for Vietnamese perch between the MSP and HSP treatments. While females participated more actively in action research in the HSP condition with production of vegetables and fish in IFCAS; vegetables production were not different (P > 0.05) among treatments. The benefit-cost ratio of different treatments was >1, indicating that investment was financially efficient for all treatments.
Language: English
Publisher: Elsevier
Copyright: CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose.
Type: Article
Country: Vietnam
Place: Netherlands
Pages: 93-100
Journal: Aquaculture Reports
Journal volume: 4
DOI: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2016.07.003
Audicence: Researchers


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Socioeconomics
    Including topics such as farming systems, markets, impact & targeting, innovations, and GIS

Show simple item record